Physical therapeutic treatment for traumatic brachial plexus injury in adults: A scoping review.

Traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) is one of the most disabling injuries of the upper extremity, often requiring specialized treatment and a prolonged rehabilitation period. This scoping review was carried out to identify and describe the physical therapy modalities applied in the rehabilitation of adult individuals with BPI. Electronic databases, gray literature, and reference lists were searched, and studies meeting the following eligibility criteria were included: (a) interventions including any physical therapy modality; (b) individuals age ≥18 years old; and (c) a clinical diagnosis of BPI. The literature search yielded 681 articles of which 49 met the inclusion criteria and had their outcomes, treatment parameters, and the differences between conservative and pre- and postoperative treatment phases analyzed. The most commonly used physical therapy interventions were in the subfields of kinesiotherapy (ie, involving range of motion exercises, muscle stretching, and strengthening), electrothermal and phototherapy, manual therapy, and sensory re-education strategies. Although several physical therapy modalities were identified for the treatment of BPI in this scoping review, the combination of low levels of evidence and the identified gaps regarding the treatment parameters challenge the reproducibility of such treatments in clinical practice. Therefore, future controlled clinical trials with clearer treatment protocols for individuals with BPI are needed.

MRI in migraineurs: are there abnormalities in the area where the myofascial trigger points are palpable and in volume measurements?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with migraine may present a higher quantity of myofascial trigger points (MTrP) and alterations in the cervical muscles when compared to non-migraineurs. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust method for the study of human soft tissues and could be useful to investigate these points. OBJECTIVES: To identify the presence of MTrP in the descending fibers of the trapezius muscle in women with migraine and to quantify the muscle volume by MRI, correlating it with the headache characteristics. METHODS: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted among 14 women, eight in migraine group, and six in without migraine group. The presence of MTrP was evaluated using Simons' criteria, and linolenic acid capsules subsequently marked the areas. MRI was performed with 1.5T, T1-weighted sequence, and T2 in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. The T1-weighted sequences were performed with and without gadolinium contrast. RESULTS: The T1-weighted image analysis with and without gadolinium did not show any signal alteration in the MTrP areas in both groups. The migraine group presented more MTrP in the trapezius muscle (MD [95%CI] = 1[1; 3]; MD [95%CI] = 1[0; 2] right and left side, respectively), and a smaller muscle volume (MD [95%CI] = -198.1[-338.7;-25.6], MD [95%CI] = -149.9[-325.05;-0.13] right and left side, respectively) than non-migraineurs. The migraine frequency presented a negative strong correlation with the trapezius volumes (r = -0.812; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Migraineurs present more MTrP and a smaller muscle volume than non-migraineurs. The trapezius volume is negatively correlated with migraine frequency. MRI is not a suitable outcome measure for assessing MTrP.

Contract-relax technique compared to static stretching in treating migraine in women: A randomized pilot trial.

INTRODUCTION: Physical therapy is often used by patients with headache, including modalities such as muscle stretching exercises. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a pilot trial aimed at determining the efficacy of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contract-relax technique compared to static stretching for treating migraineurs. METHODS: This pilot trial allocated 30 migraineur women (23 ±â€¯4 years) into PNF (n = 15) and static stretching groups (n = 15). The interventions were performed twice a week (16 sessions, 8 weeks). The feasibility outcomes included successful random allocation of 30 patients during a 12-month period, the proportion of eligible patients randomly assigned to each group, and the proportion of those who completed the 30-day follow-up. The outcomes of headache characteristics; medication intake; severity of migraine-related disability; neck disability; cervical mobility; pressure pain threshold; adverse effects and global perception of change were evaluated at baseline, after the end of treatment and after 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: The recruitment rate was 4.66% participants/month. The proportion of eligible patients randomly assigned to each group and for those who completed the 30-day follow-up was 88.23% and 100%, respectively. Both groups improved in headache-related outcomes. The perception of change was important for 67% of the PNF group and 47% of the static stretching group. No differences were found between groups regarding the studied outcomes. CONCLUSION: This is a feasible pilot trial. The PNF contract-relax technique was no more effective than static stretching for treating migraine, but both techniques improved the headache, the severity of migraine-related disability and the satisfaction after treatment.

Efficacy of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation compared to other stretching modalities in range of motion gain in young healthy adults: A systematic review.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) on range of motion (ROM) gain in young healthy adults. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials, including young healthy adults. The interventions were: PNF compared with different PNF techniques, control, other muscle stretching exercises and musculoskeletal manipulations. The outcome measures were: articular ROM and adverse effects. The final number of included studies was 46, involving 1,864 adults. There was difference on ROM comparing assisted hold-relax (HR) on diagonal plane to control, based on very low-quality evidence. There was also difference on ROM comparing assisted HR to self-HR; self-contract-relax (CR) to control; assisted CR contract to control; and assisted HR contract to control, based on low-quality evidence. Moderate-quality evidence shows that results differ between self HR and control (SMD: 0.95; 95%CI 0.03, 1.86; I249%; P = 0.16) in terms of ROM gain. When performing the other comparisons, the results were based on low or very low-quality evidence and do not allow to state if PNF is more or less effective than other stretches for improving ROM in healthy young adults. No adverse effects were mentioned.